Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Misconceptions about Small Businesses and Taxes

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) recently released an interesting report on the “Big Misconceptions about Small Businesses and Taxes” that are perpetuated by Bush-McCain Republicans in their quest to widen income disparities even further and consolidate our nation's wealth in even fewer hands.

Supporters of various tax benefits for high-income households often claim that failure to maintain them would have an undue effect on many small businesses. But even assuming a broad definition of “small business,” such claims are often exaggerated or false. This paper examines three such claims.

First, critics charge that allowing the 2001 tax cut’s reduction in the top two marginal income tax rates for individual taxpayers to expire as scheduled would affect a large proportion of small-business owners. In fact, only 1.9 percent of filers with any small-business income are projected to face either of the top two income tax rates in 2009. By contrast, more than 14 percent of filers with small-business income claim the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for low-income workers. Thus, strengthening the EITC could help more than seven times as many small businesses as reducing the top income tax rates.

Second, critics often greatly exaggerate the burden of the estate tax on small businesses. Only a tiny proportion of the few estates that pay any estate tax have significant small business or farm assets. Furthermore, the small businesses and farm estates that do pay estate tax benefit from special provisions designed to help them reduce their estate tax liability.

Third, critics often falsely claim that proposals to eliminate tax breaks for hedge fund managers would harm “mom and pop” businesses. Even the most expansive definition of a small-business owner does not fit the typical hedge fund executive.

This paper analyzes these claims. It likely overestimates the number of small businesses adversely affected by changes to the top two marginal tax rates, the estate tax, and loopholes available to hedge-fund managers because it: adopts an extremely generous definition of “small business” and does not consider many valuable tax breaks that small businesses and small-business owners enjoy. Yet it still finds that the claims typically made about small businesses and taxes are highly exaggerated, misleading, or false.

1 comment:

Ballgame said...

"...Bush-McCain Republicans in their quest to widen income disparities even further and consolidate our nation's wealth in even fewer hands."

Do you really think that's their quest? Maybe it's misguided policy that's based on the misconception that cutting taxes for the wealthy helps the poor because, as they say, a rising tide lifts all boats. I really don't think they do it with the malicious intent to widen income disparities and smite the middle class and poor. There's a powerful constituency that there tax policy plays to, but it also appeals to less well off Americans who like to think that they too might be in that position one day. I think a bigger win for Democrats is to hammer away at the Republicans' reckless spending. There spending money they don't have. Money our generation will have to pay back! I guess that's a good reason to tax the wealthy though...